Markets Celebrate. Bonds Hesitate.

Markets rarely price tomorrow’s risks until tomorrow arrives.

Market Structure — Week at a Glance

Week ending August 2, 2026
AI Mania Meets Long-End Stress

🧭THE BIG PICTURE

This Week’s Market System

Earnings Rescue Stocks as Bonds Send a Warning

Another volatile week was dominated by our central themes: higher Treasury yields, a structurally weak yen despite intervention, and continued instability across the artificial-intelligence trade.

Through it all, the resilience of the S&P 500 was impressive. The index briefly traded above 7,500 on Friday, reaching 7,512.04 before settling at 7,489.72. That was a strong finish considering the simultaneous pressure from rising long-term yields, firmer oil prices and continuing uncertainty surrounding the Iran war.

Much of the week’s angst followed Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh’s inflation-focused press conference. The Fed left the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at 3.50%–3.75%, but three regional Fed bank presidents dissented in favor of a quarter-point increase.

Warsh offered little conventional forward guidance. Instead, he expressed comfort that markets were relying on their own judgment rather than reacting mechanically to Fed speeches or the dot plot. The bond market was effectively told to work it out—and it did.

The 10-year Treasury yield climbed from approximately 4.60% early in the week to 4.75% on Friday, while the 30-year yield reached levels not seen since 2007. Oil’s rebound and persistent inflation concerns added pressure at the long end of the curve.

WTI crude settled Friday at $84.67 per barrel, completing a 21% gain for July. Brent gained 24% during the month.

📈 EQUITIES — Earnings Ultimately Dictate Leadership

What Happened

Despite the macro pressure, corporate earnings ultimately dictated market leadership.

Microsoft’s surge following its blowout results and optimistic cloud outlook restored confidence in the AI infrastructure cycle. Amazon then delivered another standout quarter, with accelerating cloud growth reinforcing the case that spending on AI infrastructure is beginning to generate tangible returns.

Those moves, together with gains in Alphabet and NVIDIA, helped offset Apple’s disappointing fiscal fourth-quarter revenue outlook. Microsoft and Amazon effectively carried the major indices higher despite rising Treasury yields, stronger oil prices and continuing geopolitical uncertainty.

Higher yields nevertheless produced clear internal damage. Utilities fell 4.2% for the week, making the sector the weakest performer as investors adjusted to a higher discount-rate environment.

Semiconductor stocks had remained under pressure early in the week as investors questioned the durability of AI infrastructure spending, the funding of future projects and the strength of memory demand. Microsoft’s results abruptly reversed that narrative, reigniting enthusiasm for the AI trade and catching many shorts holding thin air beneath a substantial gap higher.

SMH: The AI Blow-Off Tests Its Bear-Market Threshold

Situational Awareness Becomes a Warning on Leverage

The forced restructuring of Situational Awareness offered a cautionary counterpoint.

The AI-focused hedge fund sold most of its public-equity portfolio to Citadel after its portfolio value fell 67% during July. The losses reflected leverage, concentration and deteriorating liquidity as core AI positions moved sharply against the fund. CNBC reported at its peak earlier this month the fund carried a $45 billion valuation in assets. By Thursday after being forced to offload all of its leveraged stock bets, including names like SK Hynix and CoreWeave, the fund’s holdings plunged to around $10 billion.

Citadel’s acquisition of the portfolio at a discount was important for the broader market because it absorbed much of the potential forced-selling overhang. It did not eliminate the warning, however. The episode demonstrated how quickly crowded AI positions can become unstable once leverage, falling prices and vanishing liquidity begin reinforcing one another.

For context the hedge fund was started in 2024 by 22-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner who had worked at FTX’s Future Fund, the philanthropic arm tied to Sam Bankman-Fried and then became a former OpenAI researcher.

The squeeze following the Citadel bailout was pointed. Semiconductors ended the week 8.4% above Wednesday’s intraday lows, the Nasdaq100 4.0% off lows.

The subsequent earnings strength from Microsoft and Amazon therefore mattered beyond the individual companies. It stabilized confidence in the broader AI capital-spending cycle at precisely the moment when forced liquidation threatened to create another downward feedback loop.

Microsoft surged 21.8% this week, with Amazon up 17.0%, and Alphabet gaining 11.4%. Meanwhile, Qualcomm dropped 11.6%, Micron 10.6%, and AMD 8.8%. The MAG7 Index recovered 4.2% this week.

KOSPI: Crowded AI Trades Meet a Leverage Washout

Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 Shakes Technology Stocks.

The race for AI global supremacy impacts AI related stocks and is an added risk, and opportunity. Last week we saw technology stocks, already battered by memory stocks selling pressure, sell off hard after the Beijing-based Moonshot AI’s debut of Kimi K3. This posed an immediate threat to the United States as the world’s leader in the innovative technology, at least potentially. Recall DeepSeek rocked the industry in 2025, and it led to even more investment and stock prices rises after the initial panic, will this be a repeat or will this be terminal for many names?

.

For perspective back in April and June reports from the Five Eyes intelligence alliance warned that frontier AI capable of crippling governments and businesses is close. There is the concern   some of those Chinese models may have fewer guardrails than those imposed by the U.S. on the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic. “The timeline is not years, it is months,” Five Eyes warned. This also puts even more importance on cyber security and quantum computing in this theory.

Two events have helped expose that fragility.

First, reports that Meta is looking to monetize excess AI compute capacity were taken in two very different ways. For Meta, the news can be framed as positive: a new cloud-style revenue stream and a way to recover part of the enormous AI infrastructure spend. But for the broader AI infrastructure complex, it also raises a more uncomfortable question. If one of the largest hyperscalers already has enough capacity to consider selling access to it, is the AI buildout still supply-constrained, or is supply beginning to chase demand?

That does not kill the AI thesis. It does, however, change the risk profile. The market has been pricing scarcity, urgency, and infinite capex growth. Any hint that capacity can be resold, rented, or competed away challenges the most aggressive assumptions embedded in the chip, memory, neocloud, and data-center supply chain.

Second, reports that Apple is seeking approval to buy memory chips from China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies hit the memory complex hard, with Sandisk among the sharp losers. On one level, Apple’s move is understandable: memory costs have been squeezed higher by AI and data-center demand. On another level, it is a reminder that extreme pricing invites a response. When customers begin searching for alternative supply, even politically complicated alternative supply, investors start to question where they are in the cycle.

That is the core issue with semiconductors here. The fundamentals may still be strong, but the stocks have already priced a great deal of certainty.

Structure

The rally had evolved from recovery into speculative acceleration.

Since that first Fed cut, the broad averages surged, but the real epicenter has been semiconductors, AI infrastructure, memory, and the small group of companies perceived as bottlenecks in the AI buildout. The SMH has become the clearest expression of this historic Bubble impulse.

We ask the better question: is AI still lifting the world, or starting to crowd everything else out?

Why It Matters

AI spending remains the dominant narrative, but the credit side is beginning to matter. When Oracle CDS and CoreWeave yields move alongside SMH volatility, the market is no longer only trading earnings momentum — it is starting to price funding risk.

🛢 Commodities; Oil Continues Its Volatility

Why It Matters

There are at least three geopolitical risks overhanging the world, the Iran US War, the Ukraine/Russia war and China’s South China Sea maritime claims. All can impact energy and commodities prices, often not as the herd expects though. Keep that in mind. The oil price is an excellent expression of that.

In energy for the week WTI Crude dropped $4.64, or 5.2%, to $84.67 (up 48%). Gasoline sank 8.3% (up 82%), and Natural Gas dropped 4.3% to $2.747 (down 26%).

Oil enters Sunday evening under immediate downside pressure after President Donald Trump said that Middle Eastern allies had reached the parameters of a possible agreement to end the Iran war. Trump said he would hold off on ordering additional strikes while negotiations continued. He said the proposed agreement would include the immediate and complete reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.

Trump also said Israel had agreed to join the United States in attempting to complete the agreement. Iran, however, had offered no immediate public confirmation by Sunday afternoon. This is therefore not yet a peace agreement. It is a conditional pause based on the possibility of an agreement.

Oil’s initial reaction should reflect the reduced probability of immediate U.S. strikes, but the durability of any decline will depend on confirmation from Tehran and, ultimately, actual shipping flows through Hormuz.

WTI Crude: Geopolitical Premium Fades After 2.618 Completion

In metals; Spot Gold slipped 0.2% to $4,046 (down 6.3%). Silver declined 1.0% to $57.5953 (down 19.6%) and Copper bounced 2.0% (up 14%).

Developments in the Middle East suggest that it would be highly premature to declare risks to energy and broader commodity markets to have diminished sustainably. 

The commodity complex is no longer moving as one trade. The market is differentiating between monetary hedges and supply-risk assets. The bigger point is that oil remains the inflation panic switch. Crude weakness can loosen financial conditions quickly, but a failed Iran headline would just as quickly restore the risk premium.

Key line:

Copper confirms the buildout. Oil controls the panic. The long bond prices both.

📊 Bonds: July Treasury Losses Extended

The question is whether it can keep dancing while the Fed, the long end, and funding markets turn up the volume.

U.S. Treasuries ended both the week and July sharply lower.

Yields on the 10-year note and 30-year bond reached fresh highs for the year, while shorter maturities remained narrowly below their respective peaks. The relative outperformance of the two-year note produced a significant steepening of the curve, with the 2s10s spread widening by approximately 11 basis points to 46 basis points.

Crude oil’s climb toward $85 added another inflationary input after gaining more than $15 per barrel during July.

U.S. Treasury yields — Friday / weekly / July change

• 2-year: +6 bps to 4.29% / −4 bps / +15 bps
• 3-year: +8 bps to 4.36% / unchanged / +22 bps
• 5-year: +9 bps to 4.46% / +3 bps / +27 bps
• 10-year: +8 bps to 4.75% / +7 bps / +33 bps
• 30-year: +7 bps to 5.28% / +12 bps / +38 bps

The long end remains central to our thesis. A market can absorb higher yields for longer than many expect when liquidity is ample, credit spreads are tight, and equity momentum is strong. But when the long end rises at the same time as speculative positioning becomes extended, the system becomes more fragile. Higher yields do not have to matter every day. They only have to matter when the market starts caring again.

US 10-Year Yield: Oil and Inflation Overpower Safe-Haven Demand

The 10-year yield broke above 4.70% as higher oil prices, persistent inflation and rising term premium outweighed conventional safe-haven Treasury demand. A sustained break through 4.80% would place the 5.00% region back in view.

US 30-Year Yield: Triple-Top Breakout Reaches a Near 20-Year High

Growth Slows, but Inflation Remains the Problem

On the economic front, second-quarter real GDP growth slowed to an annualized 1.5%, down from 2.1% in the first quarter. Consumer spending, investment and exports still contributed positively, while government spending declined. Initial jobless claims remained below 200,000 at 197,000, suggesting that the labor market has not yet weakened materially.

June PCE inflation moderated on a year-over-year basis, but only from highly elevated levels. Headline PCE eased to 3.7% from 4.1%, while core PCE edged down to 3.3% from 3.4%. Inflation therefore remains well above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. Yet what does that target mean for markets when the bond market has been openly encouraged to determine the appropriate rate structure for itself?

That leaves investors facing a difficult combination: slowing headline growth, resilient employment, inflation well above target, rising energy prices and a central bank deliberately providing less forward guidance.

Where is the fear? 

The MOVE (bond volatility) Index rose 5.93 this week to 83.02, also not making a lot of sense with a backdrop of a 5-yr avg. 99.

Markets trading with the view that Secretary Bessent and Chair Warsh have the old “PPT” ready to rock and roll?  The Treasury and Fed won’t tolerate bond or repo market instability, a tough ask in times of extreme indebtedness and leverage during acute geopolitical uncertainty.

Hyperscalers’ bonds underperforming on almost every metric.

The massive issuance from Oracle, Meta Platforms, Alphabet, Amazon and others to fund data centers and other AI infrastructure is testing credit market depth. Falling prices, wider spreads and negative total returns see these bonds rank among the worst performers in indexes this year.

That is the shape of a market repricing policy expectations, term premium, inflation risk, and geopolitical risk together. It also reinforces one of the more important changes in this cycle: Treasuries can no longer be counted on automatically as ballast against equity and risk-asset weakness.

BIS Puts the AI Capex Risk in Plain English

In July, the Bank for International Settlements directly addressed the issue in its 2026 Annual Economic Report. The BIS warned that the five largest hyperscalers are set to spend more than $1 trillion on AI-related capex across 2025 and 2026, with commitments outpacing earnings and free cash flow. It also warned that intense competition can push firms into over-committing capital to projects with uncertain returns, leaving the whole sector vulnerable if AI payoffs disappoint.

The key point from BIS is not that AI is fake. It is that even real technological revolutions can produce bad investment cycles when too much capital chases the same perceived future winner.

That is exactly the issue today. The AI buildout is becoming a contest market. Every hyperscaler believes it cannot afford to fall behind. That creates a logic where each firm spends because the others are spending. In the short run, that is bullish for chips, power, data centers, networking, memory, and industrial infrastructure. In the long run, it risks creating excess capacity and lower returns for the sector as a whole.

The dangerous part is that the capex boom is increasingly tied into financing conditions. If the market keeps rewarding AI spending, debt and equity capital will remain abundant. If investors begin questioning the payback period, financing can pull back suddenly. That is how an investment boom turns into an investment bust.

This is why Meta and Apple mattered this week. They were not isolated stories. They were examples of the same question: is AI infrastructure still underbuilt, or is the market beginning to see signs of over-commitment?

Bond markets are pricing instability while carry markets still price abundance.

That changes everything:

• Equity valuations
• Housing affordability
• Corporate refinancing
• Government funding costs
• Private equity leverage models
• Risk parity positioning
• Markets built on zero-rate assumptions are being slowly forced to adapt to positive real yields again

As Chuck Prince famously said in July 2007:
“As long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance.”

Structure

Higher lows remain intact.

Yields continue to compress near resistance, reinforcing that pressure is building at elevated levels.

Why It Matters

• Term premium continues to rise
• Treasury supply remains persistent
• Global demand is less reliable

The long end is being set by the market — not anchored by policy.

The Bigger Shift

• Meanwhile global rates volatility is no longer isolated to the Fed. The synchronized repricing in Treasuries, Gilts and JGBs suggests sovereign duration itself is becoming the central macro story.
• That is a major shift.

The Tension

• Rates are tightening
• Carry remains loose

💵USDJPY: Reported Joint Intervention Reverses Yen Slide

For the week, the U.S. Dollar Index dropped 1.5% to 99.914 (up 1.6% y-t-d). On the upside, the Japanese yen increased 4.1% with the joint intervention. The U.S. dollar was down across the board, against the Swedish krona 2.0%, the South African rand 1.9%, the New Zealand dollar 1.5%, the South Korean won 1.4%, the euro 1.4%, the Swiss franc 1.3%, the British pound 1.2%, the Norwegian krone 1.1%, the Mexican peso 0.8%, the Singapore dollar 0.6%, the Australian dollar 0.6%, the Canadian dollar 0.5%, and the Brazilian real 0.2%. China’s (onshore) renminbi added 0.27% versus the dollar (up 3.48% y-t-d).

Japan is expected to confirm Monday that Tokyo and Washington took joint action in the currency market to arrest the yen’s slide to 40-year lows. The reported operation represents the first joint intervention by Japan and the United States since 2011. Japanese authorities reportedly bought yen during New York trading on Thursday, with Bank of Japan data suggesting intervention of as much as $58.97 billion.

The action came only hours before the Bank of Japan left monetary policy unchanged while signaling a strong possibility of another interest-rate increase.

The widening rate differential between Japan and the United States has been a central driver of yen weakness and the expansion of the carry trade. The Federal Reserve’s increasingly hawkish posture has made that divergence still more difficult for Japanese authorities to contain.

USDJPY: Coordinated Intervention Breaks the Yen’s Slide

The U.S. Treasury reportedly informed several banks Friday that it might intervene and instructed them to stand ready for possible future action.

In another indication of bilateral coordination, Japan’s Ministry of Finance made a rare English-language post stating that it had a broad range of tools available to address market-liquidity needs. These included access to the Federal Reserve’s repurchase facility, which would allow Japan to raise temporary dollar liquidity without immediately selling U.S. Treasury securities.

That matters because continued yen-buying intervention could otherwise require Japan to liquidate part of its enormous Treasury portfolio. Such sales could place still more upward pressure on U.S. long-term yields.

EM leverage, yen funding, and commodity-linked currencies all deserve close attention from here.

Cheap yen funding supported:

• U.S. Treasuries
• Global credit
• Emerging markets
• Carry trades
• Leveraged macro positioning

Structure

FX is expressing both rate differentials and global carry conditions.

Why It Matters

• A sustained normalization in Japanese yields threatens one of the foundational pillars of global liquidity.
• Long-dated Japanese government bond yields have continued pressing multi-decade highs, while 10-year yields remain near levels last seen in the late 1990s.

USDJPY is now one of the clearest expressions of dollar strength, yen funding pressure and global carry stress. A stronger dollar and higher U.S. front-end rates are tightening conditions for yen-funded trades, EM FX and leveraged macro positioning, even as risk assets remain buoyant.

💵 Extraordinary Environment of Excess, Crosscurrents and Fragility

Bank Q2 earnings this quarter underscored how loose financial conditions have been, while inflation has been above target for over five years.

• JPMorgan earnings rose 41% y-o-y to a record $21.2 billion. Net Revenues were up 15% y-o-y to $58.0 billion. Corporate & Investment Bank revenues were up 27% y-o-y to $24.9 billion. Total Trading Revenue rose to record $12.1 billion, with Equities Sales & Trading a record $6.03 billion (up 86% y-o-y). Investment Banking Fees were 30% higher y-o-y to $3.28 billion. Total Assets expanded another $115 billion, or 9.3% annualized, to a record $5.015 TN, with y-o-y growth of $463 billion (10.2%). Net Loans expanded at a 10.5% pace to $1.516 TN (up 9.3% y-o-y).
• Goldman Sachs earnings up 78% y-o-y to $6.63 billion. Net revenues were 39% higher to a record $20.3 billion – 24% ahead of estimates. The Global Banking & Markets division achieved record revenues of $15.5 billion. Asset Management revenues rose 20% y-o-y to $4.6 billion. Total Assets expanded by $67.8 billion, or 13% annualized, during the quarter to a record $2.128 TN – and surged $343 billion, or 19.2%, y-o-y. Total Loans rose $28 billion, or 24% annualized, during Q2 to a record $493 billion, with one year growth of $89.8 billion, or 19%.
• Citigroup earnings up 45% y-o-y to $5.8 billion,. Net Revenues expanded 14% y-o-y to $24.8 billion. Markets revenues were 17% higher to $7.01 billion, with Equities Trading surging 45% to a record $2.3 billion. Banking revenue jumped 34% to $1.92 billion, with Investment Banking up 44%. Total Assets expanded $117 billion, or 16.8% annualized, to a record $2.895 TN, with one-year growth of $272 billion, or 10.4%. Total Loans rose $23.6 billion, or 11% annualized, to $877 billion, with one-year growth of $87.6 billion, or 11.1%.
• Bank of America earnings up 27% y-o-y to $9.1 billion, with net revenues rising 15% to $31.6 billion. Sales & Trading revenues rose 33% to $7.2 billion, with Equities Trading surging to a record $3.62 billion. Investment Banking revenues jumped 50% y-o-y to $2.14 billion. Total Assets were marginally higher at a record $3.499 TN, with Total Loans expanding at a 3% pace to a record $1.224 TN (up $71.7bn, or 6.2%, y-o-y).

The loop is powerful until it breaks.

The same message shows up in the Fed’s Financial Accounts data.

In this extraordinary environment of excess, crosscurrents and fragility, the Q1 Z.1 data were timely. The report remains one of the best places to see where the rubber meets the road — or, in this cycle, where hot rubber meets overheated pavement.

• Non-financial debt expanded at a $4.577 trillion annualized pace in Q1, up from $3.829 trillion in Q4 and well above Q1 2025’s $2.706 trillion. That degree of credit growth is inflationary. For perspective, annual non-financial debt growth averaged only $1.874 trillion during the decade from 2010 through 2019.
• Federal borrowings expanded at a $2.256 trillion annualized pace, accounting for roughly half of Q1 system credit growth. Corporate borrowings jumped to an 8.83% pace, more than double 2025’s rate and the fastest since 2020.
• Broker/dealer balance sheets also continued to expand. Debt-security holdings rose $109 billion to a record $1.408 trillion. Repo liabilities surged $213 billion to $3.041 trillion, the highest since Q1 2008. Repo has now expanded $1.427 trillion, or 88%, over the past 14 quarters — an uncomfortable echo of the mortgage-finance bubble period.
• Household financial assets rose $11.830 trillion year-over-year to $141.605 trillion. The new Z.1 “Total Equities” category, which includes stocks held directly and indirectly, surged $8.879 trillion to $64.800 trillion. Over three years, household equity holdings have inflated by $21.922 trillion, or 51%.

That is the backdrop: historic credit growth, record household financial assets, repo expansion, tight credit spreads, AI debt issuance, semiconductors up 89% year-to-date, and AUDJPY still near highs. High rates are hurting parts of the economy, but they have not yet broken the carry trade or the speculative bull market.

Ahead: Jobs Report, PMI, and Earnings

The July employment report will be the week’s principal macro event. Reuters’ current consensus calls for an increase of 83,000 in nonfarm payrolls and a rise in the unemployment rate to 4.3%. A materially stronger report would increase pressure on the Fed to raise rates in September, particularly with core inflation still running at 3.3%.

Other major releases include:

• Final July global S&P manufacturing and services PMIs
• U.S. ISM manufacturing and services reports
• JOLTS job openings
• July ADP employment
• Second-quarter productivity and unit labor costs
• Weekly jobless claims
• Weekly crude-oil inventories
• Weekly natural-gas storage, following the prior 28-bcf injection

The Reserve Bank of India is widely expected to leave its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 5.25%

Key Earnings

• AI, semiconductors and infrastructure:
  Palantir, Advanced Micro Devices, Arista Networks, ON Semiconductor, Astera Labs, SanDisk and Western Digital.
• SpaceX will also deliver its first quarterly report as a public company. Given the stock’s post-IPO volatility and its importance to broader speculative risk appetite, that report should be included among the week’s major AI and technology events.
• Cloud, software and digital platforms:
  Shopify, AppLovin, Cloudflare, Datadog, Twilio and Unity Software.
• Travel and platforms:
  Airbnb.
• Energy:
  BP, ConocoPhillips, Occidental Petroleum, Devon Energy, ONEOK, Energy Transfer, Phillips 66, Petrobras, Marathon Petroleum, Canadian Natural Resources, Suncor Energy, EOG Resources, Cheniere Energy and MPLX.
• Power and utilities:
  Duke Energy, Vistra and Constellation Energy..

⚠️RISK RADAR

What Could Break the Melt-Up?

• Credit spreads reacting to duration stress
• Sustained move above 5% in US 30-year yields
• Disorderly JGB repricing forcing BOJ intervention
• Oil spike reigniting inflation expectations
• Failed Treasury auctions / weak foreign demand
• Carry trade unwind in AUDJPY or EM FX
• Commodity divergence widening — crude vulnerable to headlines, metals acting as hedges, energy equities trying to hold.

Any of these could force markets to reprice quickly

🧠 FINAL THOUGHT

This remains a liquidity-led market. The AI tape has been hit hard but we are seeing rotation from profit taking to other sectors. Financial conditions are loose, but investors are reassessing risk on issuance, and AI infrastructure. The second quarter showed how far a market can run when short covering and FOMO overwhelm macro concerns.

But the risk is becoming more specific. It is no longer just “rates are high” or “valuations are stretched.” The real risk is that the AI capex cycle has become self-reinforcing at the same time financing conditions have become easy again.

That can keep the party going. It can also make the eventual adjustment more violent.

For now, the market is still climbing. But semiconductors gave the first serious reminder this fortnight that even the strongest narratives can wobble when investors start asking about payback, capacity, and supply response.

The Cautious Investor view remains the same: respect the momentum, respect the liquidity, but do not confuse a blow-off quarter with a low-risk entry point.

Follow & Resources

• Real-time economic calendar: Investing.com
• More analysis: www.traderscommunity.com

Follow:
@traderscom | @thepitboss16 | @knovawave | @ClemsnideClem

Disclaimer

Charts, opinions, and data are for informational purposes only and subject to change.
Trade and invest at your own risk.

Trade Smart!